Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Optimism versus Hope

The other day I was talking with a friend about the difference between optimism and hope. The optimist, we discussed, believes that everything is fine and will continue to be fine. A hopeful individual, on the other hand, accepts when life is not good, but recognizes that through change life can expand, and hopefully, move into something richer—a more fulfilling way of being. Change is not necessarily easy. Hope does not make any promises. We cannot control the future, but we can work towards a better one.

Reflecting on this, I realized that I am not an optimist. Over the past few months, I have become a self-appointed “peak-nik.” The topic of peak oil has consumed my free time—however small. Well-meaning family and friends cannot understand my obsession with this topic and on the surface neither can I. I am sucked in daily by energy websites that I have a compulsive need to “check.” Based upon months of reading and reflection, I can say with some certainty that the future does not look good. In actuality, it freaks me out. I have two small children, for god’s sake. Topics such as the potential die-off of millions of people, the mass migrations of people seeking warmth, food and water, and the complete fragmentation of the modern industrial state are not cheery subjects. It would be easy to dismiss such scenarios if they were posited by a lunatic fringe, but these scenarios come from unlikely sources including many of the world’s top scientists and geologists, and even the US Department of Energy. As Roscoe Bartlett, Chairman of the Projection Forces Subcommittee of the Armed Services Committee presented to the US Congress this past March;

“ ‘…civilization as we know it is coming to an end soon.’ I hope not. This is not the wacky proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse Bible sect or conspiracy theory society. Rather, it is a scientific conclusion of the best-paid, most widely respected geologists, physicists and investment bankers in the world. These are rational, professional, conservative individuals who are absolutely terrified by the phenomenon known as global peak oil.”

I have never been a huge advocate of the suburban way of life, preferring to live in more urban settings where I can easily walk or take public transport, so when I first heard about peak oil, I was perversely excited. Good, no more SUV’s on the road, no more bland suburban strip malls nor unwalkable cul-de-sac neighborhoods. We will be forced into a more communal way of living (ha!). After further investigation I came to understand the sick yet profound hold that cheap energy has upon our society and my individual lifestyle. I love going to the movies, I love to travel, I love rock n’ roll, I love chocolate, I love my newly renovated home. It is doubtful that these past-times would exist on the same scale and intensity for most of us, if it were not for cheap energy. Our entire economic infrastructure is based upon growth, new markets and expansion.

James Howard Kunstler in the Long Emergency says that the Pacific Northwest is one of three regions of the United States, “less likely to fall into lawlessness, anarchy or despotism and more likely to salvage the bits and pieces of our best social traditions and keep them in operation at some level.” For the last 15 years I have studied architecture and urban design in varying capacities, and the shaping of community or social traditions has been my primary pursuit. Spokane and the Pacific Northwest are important places to me. I have lived in various cities throughout the United States and Europe and enjoyed them thoroughly. But they were not my place. Spokane is. I know my neighbors and I live in the neighborhood I grew up in. The beauty of its setting and people continue to inspire and awe me. My children can walk to school and neighbors plan potlucks and yard sales on the tree-lined boulevard that runs down the center of the street. We share childcare and discuss politics. I realize that this is an anomaly, but to me, this is the best of human culture.

Steven Lagavulin in his blog entitled The Collapse of Civilization and the Rebirth of Community says that, “if our relationship with the Earth is to continue, we will need to transform our human culture and society completely,” and that possibly, peak oil is “an image that can help us prepare.” So rather than dismiss the incredibly sordid details of the pending collapse of the industrial world, I recognize them and have even come to accept them. What does this mean for my life and my children? I don’t know, but I have hope that we can move forward even through periods of enormous upheaval.

What are the questions we should be asking? How can our society change, and move into a truly sustainable system? What are healthy, viable alternatives to the standard “American Way of Life?” What does a new society look like? As a member of the Inland Northwest community, I want to help to envision something else, something more authentic. I also know that there are many wonderful, passionate people in this community that work for these ideals on a daily basis and I want more people to be aware of this.

Hopefully this blog site can enrich the Sustainable Living column I write for OutThere Monthly as well as aid in the transformation of society and in particular the Inland Northwest. It will not be simply a survivalist manifesto. I am not hoarding food and water, but I am planning an edible landscape. I am not stock-piling guns and ammo, but I did purchase a tankless hot water heater that can be operated with solar power. I believe that our move toward decentralized local communities is imperative for our survival, but beyond that it is also our opportunity to create truly responsible, life-affirming communities.

2 Comments:

At 9:57 AM, Blogger John Nephew said...

Hey, Juliet. Cool blog. Do you have an RSS/Atom syndication feed that I can add to my Feedreader for auto updates?

Re: Peak Oil -- yes, it's scary, but it's just the latest theory in the apocalyptic genre, lent urgency by experiences like the post-Katrina gasoline price spike (and the one we'll probably see from Rita in the next few days). A couple of generations ago it was the "population bomb." Like they say, a trend is likely to continue until it changes. In the case of overpopulation, the apocalyptic theorists didn't believe that people would actually change their behavior -- that as countries developed, the forces that led people to have families as large as possible would wane, and in their place would emerge forces leading people to have families that were smaller, and to have children later in life. Trends in human history are never linear in the big picture.

What we need to deal with the problem of peak oil is enlightened policies working with the free market. For example, government subsidies to maintain low oil/gas prices (and under this umbrella I include all the tax benefits given to oil drillers, opening ANWR to drilling, easing environmental regulations, etc.) are not simply a band-aid, but are actually counterproductive -- they may make people a little happier to save a few cents a gallon today, but they will in the long run keep us dependent on the oil economy and sharpen the economic and social dislocations when it comes apart. Instead, government policies and investment need to go toward a head start on technology that will become more useful and more economical as oil prices supplies dwindle.

Rising prices of oil and gas need to work their free market magic. I know it pinches the pockebook, but I don't mind seeing oil at the current prices or higher, and gas over $3 at the pump. These higher prices increase the return on investment in conservation (better insulating our homes, buying hybrid cars, using public transit), which is good on many levels (including reducing greenhouse gas emissions); and they also make alternative/renewable energy and plastic feedstock sources viable.

Consider:
- Biodiesel will become attractive to trucking and transportation companies
- If oil is over $30/barrel, then the the Fischer-Tropsch process for converting coal to fuel becomes economical, as Montana's governor advocates (http://www.missoulanews.com/News/News.asp?no=5158)
- Similarly, as petroleum prices rise, plastics and chemicals derived from renewable sources will become increasingly attractive from a price point of view (http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/235/)
- Expensive petroleum may increase the economic benefits of organic farming techniques, eschewing the use of petroleum-derived materials
- We are on the edge of incredible advances in areas like semiconductor technology (with carbon nanotubes, for example) and high-temperature superconductors. These offer hope of more economical generation (higher efficiency solar cells, for example) and transmission (less loss on power lines).

The apocalyptic view of peak oil posits that supply will begin to wane while demand will remain or increase. I think in reality there is a lot of elasticity to demand; and of course the oil wells will not dry up overnight. As prices rise, consumers and businesses will make choices to reduce their costs, which in the aggregate will lower demand. Demand may not lower fast enough to hold down the petroleum prices, but continuing price increases will only incentivize more people to change their energy habits. Given the way that declining output from oilfields works, I just don't see a "Mad Max" scenario of roving bands of armed suburban housewives ravaging the landscape in a quest for more fuel for their SUVs as likely.

Indeed, I think peak oil may be a good thing, as weaning our global dependence on petroleum (and inevitably moving to sustainable and renewable sources of energy and materials) will ultimately be better for the planet and for our collective health.

As for energy in the abstract, I'm not too worried until the sun is going to head into its red giant phase. Up until then, it's just a matter of finding the ways of converting the more-than-enough solar radiation that bathes our planet into useful forms, as life has been doing successfully for several billion years now.

 
At 11:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do You interesting how to [b]Buy Viagra per pill[/b]? You can find below...
[size=10]>>>[url=http://listita.info/go.php?sid=1][b]Buy Viagra per pill[/b][/url]<<<[/size]

[URL=http://imgwebsearch.com/30269/link/viagra%2C%20tramadol%2C%20zithromax%2C%20carisoprodol%2C%20buy%20cialis/1_valentine3.html][IMG]http://imgwebsearch.com/30269/img0/viagra%2C%20tramadol%2C%20zithromax%2C%20carisoprodol%2C%20buy%20cialis/1_valentine3.png[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://imgwebsearch.com/30269/link/buy%20viagra/3_headsex1.html][IMG]http://imgwebsearch.com/30269/img0/buy%20viagra/3_headsex1.png[/IMG][/URL]
[b]Bonus Policy[/b]
Order 3 or more products and get free Regular Airmail shipping!
Free Regular Airmail shipping for orders starting with $200.00!

Free insurance (guaranteed reshipment if delivery failed) for orders starting with $300.00!
[b]Description[/b]

Generic Viagra (sildenafil citrate; brand names include: Aphrodil / Edegra / Erasmo / Penegra / Revatio / Supra / Zwagra) is an effective treatment for erectile dysfunction regardless of the cause or duration of the problem or the age of the patient.
Sildenafil Citrate is the active ingredient used to treat erectile dysfunction (impotence) in men. It can help men who have erectile dysfunction get and sustain an erection when they are sexually excited.
Generic Viagra is manufactured in accordance with World Health Organization standards and guidelines (WHO-GMP). Also you can find on our sites.
Generic [url=http://viagra.deutafilm.ru]buy generic viagra online in canada[/url] is made with thorough reverse engineering for the sildenafil citrate molecule - a totally different process of making sildenafil and its reaction. That is why it takes effect in 15 minutes compared to other drugs which take 30-40 minutes to take effect.
[b]Find Viagra Online
bodybuilding pump with viagra
Viagra Energy Drink
cheap viagra online a href
local viagra
buy viagra for women
Split Viagra
[/b]
Even in the most sexually liberated and self-satisfied of nations, many people still yearn to burn more, to feel ready for bedding no matter what the clock says and to desire their partner of 23 years as much as they did when their love was brand new.
The market is saturated with books on how to revive a flagging libido or spice up monotonous sex, and sex therapists say “lack of desire” is one of the most common complaints they hear from patients, particularly women.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home